MacNN | Apple vs Samsung: Judge orders further narrowing of claims
Mac News Network View: Standard | Headlines | Categorized | Slim
Mac News Network
Mac News iPod News Reviews Forums
 

Desktop Headlines
Apple vs Samsung: Judge orders further narrowing of claims
Thursday, April 25, 2013 @ 7:30pm

As she did in the first Apple vs. Samsung patent trial, Judge Lucy Koh is again requiring the companies to narrow their claims and limit the scope of their arguments against each other as both firms prepare for a second patent trial on different patent infringement arguments than those in the first trial, which Apple won handily but is currently on appeal. The order, which was issued late on Wednesday, comes ahead of some possible summary judgement rulings that could leave either Apple or Samsung with fewer patents to argue over.



The summary judgement rulings are expected to take place in December of this year, with the full trial (assuming matters proceed to that stage) scheduled to start at the end of March, 2014. In a previous order, Judge Koh limited both companies to ten claims total from as many as five different patents per side for the summary judgement hearing. The new ruling sets a time limit of February 6, well past the summary judgement phase (in which, presumably, some patents from either company may be tossed out of the case or invalidated) further narrows the limitation for the actual trial to five claims per side. As trial and patent law analyst Florian Mueller observes, this means that which ever company prevails during the summary judgement hearings will be able to assert a greater number of patents within their allotted five claims, giving them a better chance of overall success. The order also limits accused products to 10 per side at present, though Apple may still prevail with its proposal to simply allow "representative" products to be specifically accused, with similar products being included if the representative one is found guilty of infringement. Given Koh's procedures in the last trial, this proposal stands a good chance of eventually being adopted, as it simplifies the work of the jury. In addition, the new order limits each company's "invalidity" arguments (reasons why the other company's patents may be invalid) to 15 per side. This would mean that if a company asserted five patents at the trial, the average number of theories the other company could present about why the patents may be invalid would average three per patent. According to Mueller, the trial in March is expected to run only 12 days, and thus both companies can expect to face further limits as they did in the first trial, on matters such as the number of "expert" witnesses and how long each side is allowed to question witnesses.

Comments on this Article
Print Friendly Version
Email to a Friend
Add MacNN to Your RSS Feeds
Buy from the Apple Store


Related Stories:

Today's MacNN Stories:

  • Watch ABC app for Apple TV gets full episodes for non-subscribers - 9:18 AM EST
  • Samsung shutting down ChatOn cross-platform messaging service in 2015 - 7:12 AM EST
  • Hands On: Photon Flash Player for iPad (iOS) - 7:08 AM EST
  • Uber agrees with Portland council to suspend service for three months - 6:04 AM EST
  • Hottest Apple products see improved supply for final Xmas push - 4:13 AM EST
  • Misfortune Cookie exploit endangers 12 million routers - 3:06 AM EST
  • Hands On: Snapselect photo management app (OS X) - 2:03 AM EST
  • Analysis: Title II regulation, with forbearance, the best path forward - 12:18 AM EST

    Today's iPodNN Stories:
  • Google posts response to leaked Sony 'Project Goliath' emails - 4:41 AM EST
  • Plaintiffs in Google antitrust lawsuit required to submit more details - 11:13 PM EST
  • Interview fallout continues: actors complain, Team America taken down - 7:35 PM EST
  • Intel processors rumored to appear in two Lenovo smartphone launches - 3:20 PM EST
  • ICANN servers accessed following 'spear phishing' attack - 7:09 AM EST
  • No comments posted on this story yet. Please post yours.
    Your Comments
    In order to post comments, you must be a registered member of the MacNN Forums and logged in. Please login with your MacNN Forums username and password.

    MacNN Forums Login:

    MacNN Forums Password:

    Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.